Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This protocol describes a research project investigating changes in individual differences in the context of relationship transitions in single and partnered individuals. While prior research has examined long-term personality change in the context of life events, this study takes a fine-grained, dynamic approach to capture short-term personality changes before, during, and after relationship transitions. The study integrates trait-level, state-level, and situational perspectives to examine how personality co-evolves with relationship transitions. By employing narrower assessment intervals and considering self-perceived event characteristics, this study aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of personality-change mechanisms in romantic relationships. The study employs a measurement-burst design over 2.5 years, following N = 1,781 participants aged 18–40 (mean age 26.5 years). Half of the sample started the study being single while the other half started in a relationship. Participants completed seven assessment waves at five-month intervals, each consisting of (a) global assessments at the start and end of each wave, and (b) a 3-day experience sampling phase in between. This design enables the investigation of selection effects (who experiences relationship transitions based on personality), anticipation effects (changes in personality before a transition), and socialization effects (changes in personality following relationship transitions). Additionally, by integrating situational context and subjective event characteristics, the research project aimed to address gaps in previous research on personality-situation interactions in relationship transitions. This research project is one of the first to systematically examine short-term personality dynamics in response to romantic relationship transitions. By capturing moment-to-moment changes, it advances research on personality change, relationship research, and life event perception.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grob et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: