Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study explores the Petrov–Galerkin method’s application in solving a linear fourth-order ordinary beam equation of the form <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:mi>u</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mo accent="true">″</m:mo> <m:mo accent="false">″</m:mo> </m:mrow> <m:mo>+</m:mo> <m:mi>q</m:mi> <m:mi>u</m:mi> <m:mo>=</m:mo> <m:mi>f</m:mi> </m:math> u^{} ^{} +qu=f . The equation entails two distinct boundary conditions: pinned–pinned conditions on <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mi>u</m:mi> </m:math> u and <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mi>u</m:mi> <m:mo accent="false">′</m:mo> </m:math> u^{} , and clamped–clamped conditions on <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mi>u</m:mi> </m:math> u and <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:msup> <m:mrow> <m:mi>u</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mo accent="true">″</m:mo> </m:mrow> </m:msup> </m:math> {u}^{^{} } . To satisfy these boundary conditions, we have built two sets of basis functions. The explicit forms of all spectral matrices were reported. The nonhomogeneous boundary conditions were easily handled using perfect transformations, ensuring the numerical solution’s accuracy. Detailed analysis of the method’s convergence was studied. Some numerical examples were presented, accompanied by comparisons with other existing methods in the literature.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Youssri et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: