Key result
Enhanced recovery programmes for knee arthroplasty support improvements in length of stay and morbidity, though a lack of consensus on specific interventions complicates comparison.
Why the study?
Do enhanced recovery programmes improve outcomes such as length of stay and morbidity in patients undergoing knee arthroplasty?
Do enhanced recovery programmes improve outcomes such as length of stay and morbidity in patients undergoing knee arthroplasty?
Enhanced recovery programmes in knee arthroplasty appear to improve length of stay and morbidity, but standardization of protocols is needed to better evaluate their impact.
Should not yet change knee arthroplasty practice; leaves open standardization for definitive trials.
The concept of a multimodal approach to improve the care of surgical patients was first proposed by Kehlet in the 1990s. Measures to optimise the surgical patient, and minimise perioperative stresses, aimed to improve postoperative outcomes. Although originally introduced in colorectal surgery, these ‘enhanced recovery programmes' have now seen widespread uptake in multiple surgical specialities, including orthopaedics. Patients undergoing knee arthroplasty are well suited to an enhanced recovery approach. These programmes optimise the patient at each stage of the surgical journey, including preoperative optimisation of fitness, perioperative anaesthetic and surgical techniques and finally postoperative rehabilitation and discharge plans. The available evidence supports a number of improvements after programme introduction, including shorter length of stay, morbidity and economics. However, the impact on other outcomes is less clear. One of the issues in the field is a lack of consensus on what interventions an enhanced recovery programme should contain and the specifics of these interventions. As a result, individual units develop their own programmes, making the interpretation and comparison of their impact difficult. This article discusses interventions that could be considered for inclusion in an enhanced recovery programme for knee arthroplasty.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Middleton et al. (2018) conducted a review in Knee arthroplasty. Enhanced recovery programmes was evaluated. Enhanced recovery programmes for knee arthroplasty support improvements in length of stay and morbidity, though a lack of consensus on specific interventions complicates comparison.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: