Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The exchange coupling between rare-earth (R) and transition-metal (T) moments in RₓTy compounds is not so large as to hold the R and T moments rigidly parallel (for light rare-earth elements) or antiparallel (for heavy rare-earth elements); ionic magnetocrystalline anisotropy energy can be comparable to this intersublattice exchange. Anisotropy torques and/or an external field can induce canting between the sublattice moments. We show that this canting, even when small, can reduce the macroscopic effective anisotropy by a very large amount---more than an order of magnitude---from the intrinsic sublattice anisotropies. Consideration of the effects of canting reconcile hitherto conflicting reports, by spin-wave scattering and moment measurements, of the magnetic anisotropies of Ho₂{Co}₁₇$ and ${Ho}₂Fe₁₇. One conclusion of our analysis is that since a huge degeneration of macroscopic magnetic anisotropy, and hence of the coercivity, comes from sublattice flexing, it seems to follow that to increase coercivity one should be trying to increase R-T exchange; the ionic magnetic anisotropy is already greater than its effective value.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sarkis et al. (1982) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: