Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No AccessPerspectives on Aural Rehabilitation and Its InstrumentationArticle1 Oct 2000Hearing Aid Research Mark Ross Mark Ross University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT Rehabilitation Engineering Research Center, Lexington School for the DeafJackson Heights, NY Google Scholar More articles by this author https://doi.org/10.1044/arii8.1.3 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationTrack Citations ShareFacebookTwitterLinked In References Bess, F. (2000, June). Professional training: Past, present, future. Paper delivered at the Early Childhood Deafness Symposium, Emerson College, Boston, MA. Google Scholar Mueller, G. (2000). What's the digital difference when it comes to patient benefit?.The Hearing Journal, 53(3), 23–32. Google Scholar McCandless, G., Sjursen, W., & Preves, D. (2000). Satisfying patient needs with 9 fixed prescription formats.The Hearing Journal, 53(5), 42–50. Google Scholar Preves, D. & Dempsey, D. (2000). Speech recognition in noise results for a disposable hearing aid.The Hearing Review, 7(4), 34–42. Google Scholar Staab, W. J. & Preves, D. (2000). Deep canal hearing instrument fittings: A new approach.The Hearing Review, 7(6), 50–53. Google Scholar Additional Resources FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 8Issue 1October 2000Pages: 3-5 Get Permissions Add to your Mendeley library History Published in issue: Oct 1, 2000 Metrics Topicsasha-topicsleader-topicsasha-sigsasha-article-typesCopyright & Permissions© 2000 American Speech-Language-Hearing AssociationPDF DownloadLoading ...
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mark Ross (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: