Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Within local bird communities, relationships between body size and abundance across the subtaxa within lower-level taxa (such as species within genera) are no more likely to be positive than those across the subtaxa in higher-level taxa (such as suborders within orders). 2. The species within tribes of birds which have no close relatives in the world tend to show positive relationships between body size and population abundance. However, the relatedness of the tribe to others in its community is not a significant predictor of the sign of the body size-abundance pattern. 3. The date at which the species last shared a common ancestor is a better predictor of the size-abundance pattern than is the relatedness of a tribe to other birds in the world
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cotgreave et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: