Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Counter-secular religion and worldview education scholars are fighting old battles. Their challenge to secular epistemic dominance remains an important front. But now a new and urgent front of the same battle has emerged: the threat of post-truth. Worryingly, some of the arguments developed at the first front may inadvertently weaken the second. Securing both fronts by combining epistemic pluralism with epistemic reliability is a difficult but necessary task. A post-truth world where might make right is unlikely to benefit the vulnerable students that counter-secular religion and worldview education scholarship seeks to empower. In this article, I develop a double anchor to counter post-truth in contexts of epistemic superdiversity, using Norway as one key example. It consists of mature scientific literacy and dialogic pedagogical language. I defend this approach against two objections: that it maintains problematic secular hegemony, and that it reproduces colonial epistemology. Religion and worldview education should be anchored in a physical and social shared world that gives us feedback. Such truth-tracking is necessary for democratic education and social justice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lars Laird Iversen (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: