Key result
Sparsentan significantly reduced the urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio from baseline compared to irbesartan (45% vs 19%; P=0.006) after 8 weeks in patients with primary FSGS.
Why the study?
Does sparsentan reduce proteinuria compared to irbesartan in patients with primary FSGS?
RCT (n=109)
Double-blind
randomized
Does sparsentan reduce proteinuria compared to irbesartan in patients with primary FSGS?
Absolute Event Rate: 45% vs 19%
p-value: p=0.006
Sparsentan significantly reduced proteinuria compared to irbesartan in patients with FSGS after 8 weeks of treatment.
Sparsentan may be preferred over irbesartan for proteinuria reduction in primary FSGS; confirms dual endothelin-angiotensin blockade benefit in this population.
Background We evaluated and compared the effects of sparsentan, a dual endothelin type A (ET A ) and angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist, with those of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist irbesartan in patients with primary FSGS. Methods In this phase 2, randomized, double-blind, active-control Efficacy and Safety of Sparsentan (RE-021), a Dual Endothelin Receptor and Angiotensin Receptor Blocker, in Patients with Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis (FSGS): A Randomized, Double-blind, Active-Control, Dose-Escalation Study (DUET), patients aged 8–75 years with biopsy-proven FSGS, eGFR>30 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 , and urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio (UP/C) ≥1.0 g/g received sparsentan (200, 400, or 800 mg/d) or irbesartan (300 mg/d) for 8 weeks, followed by open-label sparsentan only. End points at week 8 were reduction from baseline in UP/C (primary) and proportion of patients achieving FSGS partial remission end point (FPRE) (UP/C: ≤1.5 g/g and >40% reduction [secondary]). Results Of 109 patients randomized, 96 received study drugs and had baseline and week 8 UP/C measurements. Sparsentan-treated patients had greater reductions in UP/C than irbesartan-treated patients did when all doses (45% versus 19%; P =0.006) or the 400 and 800 mg doses (47% versus 19%; P =0.01) were pooled for analysis. The FSGS partial remission end point was achieved in 28% of sparsentan-treated and 9% of irbesartan-treated patients ( P =0.04). After 8 weeks of treatment, BP was reduced with sparsentan but not irbesartan, and eGFR was stable with both treatments. Overall, the incidence of adverse events was similar between groups. Hypotension and edema were more common among sparsentan-treated patients but did not result in study withdrawals. Conclusions Patients with FSGS achieved significantly greater reductions in proteinuria after 8 weeks of sparsentan versus irbesartan. Sparsentan was safe and well tolerated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Trachtman et al. (2018) conducted an RCT in Primary Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) (n=109). Sparsentan vs. Irbesartan (300 mg/d) was evaluated on Reduction from baseline in urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio (UP/C) (p=0.006). Sparsentan significantly reduced the urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio from baseline compared to irbesartan (45% vs 19%; P=0.006) after 8 weeks in patients with primary FSGS.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: