Researchers investigated the effects of a read-aloud modification on students' performance on a reading comprehension test. A total of 338 students in Grades 4 and 5 participated; 76 of these students (22%) received special education services, the majority of whom were labeled learning disabled. Students completed a standardized reading comprehension test under two conditions: (a) standard administration, and (b) video administration. A repeated measures analysis of variance revealed a significant interaction between educational classification and administration format. We compared teacher judgments related to the importance of the read-aloud modification for individual students to students' actual test performance. Teacher judgment was the most accurate for students in special education. Findings were interpreted within three different contexts: (a) previous research on teacher decision making, (b) theoretical explanations of reading versus listening comprehension, and (c) the importance of research methodologies in answering test modification questions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Crawford et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: