Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We tested the hypothesis that one-lung ventilation (OLV) with high tidal volumes (Vt) and zero positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) may lead to ventilator-induced lung injury. In an isolated, perfused rabbit lung model, Vt and PEEP were set to avoid lung collapse and overdistension in both lungs, resulting in a straight pressure-time (P-vs-t) curve during constant flow. Animals were randomized to (a) nonprotective OLV (left lung) (n = 6), with Vt values as high as before randomization and zero PEEP; (b) protective OLV (left lung) (n = 6), with 50% reduction of Vt and maintenance of PEEP as before randomization; and (c) control group (n = 6), with ventilation of two lungs as before randomization. The nonprotective OLV was associated with significantly smaller degrees of collapse and overdistension in the ventilated lung (P < 0.001). Peak inspiratory pressure values were higher in the nonprotective OLV group (P < 0.001) and increased progressively throughout the observation period (P < 0.01). The mean pulmonary artery pressure and lung weight gain values, as well as the concentration of thromboxane B2, were comparatively higher in the nonprotective OLV group (P < 0.05). A ventilatory strategy with Vt values as high as those used in the clinical setting and zero PEEP leads to ventilator-induced lung injury in this model of OLV, but this can be minimized with Vt and PEEP values set to avoid lung overdistension and collapse.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abreu et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: