Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The authors place the evolution of politics in education and the politics of education field in historical context and introduce a framework for understanding how three theoretical streams-micropolitics, political culture, and neoinstitutionalism-emerged as the behavioralist movement receded. They argue that although there may appear to be a messy center lacking a single disciplinary paradigm, the field has been advancing by means of integrative and aggregative drives that are, indeed, complementary as well as competitive and result in a healthy and productive state of the field.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Scribner et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: