Key result
Ticagrelor monotherapy did not significantly reduce mortality or new Q-wave MI compared to standard therapy in ACS (RR 0.86; 95% CI 0.69-1.08) or SCAD (RR 0.87; 95% CI 0.71-1.08) patients.
Why the study?
The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy after coronary drug-eluting stent placement in adults with stable coronary artery disease versus acute coronary syndromes remains uncertain.
Does 1 month of DAPT followed by 23 months of ticagrelor monotherapy reduce all-cause mortality or new Q-wave myocardial infarction compared to standard 12-month DAPT followed by aspirin monotherapy in adults with stable coronary artery disease or acute coronary syndromes after coronary drug-eluting stent placement?
RCT (n=15,968)
1:1
Does 1 month of DAPT followed by 23 months of ticagrelor monotherapy reduce all-cause mortality or new Q-wave myocardial infarction compared to standard 12-month DAPT followed by aspirin monotherapy in adults with stable coronary artery disease or acute coronary syndromes after coronary drug-eluting stent placement?
Relative Risk: 0.86 (95% CI 0.69–1.08)
Absolute Event Rate: 3.92% vs 4.52%
p-value: p=0.189
In patients undergoing drug-eluting stent placement, 1 month of DAPT followed by ticagrelor monotherapy did not improve ischemic outcomes compared to standard 12-month DAPT, but reduced major bleeding in the ACS subgroup.
Ticagrelor monotherapy after 1-month DAPT offers no ischemic benefit versus standard DAPT; confirms neutral effect on mortality or Q-wave MI post-DES.
Background The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy after coronary drug‐eluting stent placement in adults with stable coronary artery disease (SCAD) versus acute coronary syndromes (ACS) remains uncertain. Methods and Results This was a prespecified subgroup analysis of the GLOBAL LEADERS trial. Participants were randomly assigned 1:1 to the experimental or reference strategy, stratified by ACS (experimental, n=3750; reference, n=3737) versus SCAD (experimental, n=4230; reference, n=4251). The experimental strategy was 75 to 100 mg aspirin daily plus 90 mg ticagrelor twice daily for 1 month, followed by 23 months of ticagrelor monotherapy. The reference strategy was 75 to 100 mg aspirin daily plus either 75 mg clopidogrel daily (for SCAD) or 90 mg ticagrelor twice daily (for ACS) for 12 months, followed by aspirin monotherapy for 12 months. The primary end point at 2 years was a composite of all‐cause mortality or non‐fatal centrally adjudicated new Q‐wave myocardial infarction. The key secondary safety end point was site‐reported Bleeding Academic Research Consortium grade 3 or 5 bleeding. The primary end point occurred in 147 (3.92%) versus 169 (4.52%) patients with ACS (rate ratio [RR], 0.86; 95% CI, 0.69–1.08; P =0.189), and in 157 (3.71%) versus 180 (4.23%) patients with SCAD (RR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.71–1.08; P =0.221) with experimental and reference strategy, respectively ( P ‐interaction=0.926). Bleeding Academic Research Consortium grade 3 or 5 bleeding occurred in 73 (1.95%) versus 100 (2.68%) patients with ACS (RR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.54–0.98; P =0.037), and in 90 (2.13%) versus 69 (1.62%) patients with SCAD (RR, 1.32; 95% CI, 0.97–1.81; P =0.081; P ‐interaction=0.007). Conclusions While there was no evidence for differences in efficacy between treatment strategies by subgroup, the experimental strategy appeared to reduce bleeding risk in patients with ACS but not in patients with SCAD. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT01813435.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vranckx et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in Stable coronary artery disease (SCAD) or acute coronary syndromes (ACS) (n=15,968). Ticagrelor monotherapy vs. 75 to 100 mg aspirin daily plus either 75 mg clopidogrel daily (for SCAD) or 90 mg ticagrelor twice daily (for ACS) for 12 months, followed by aspirin monotherapy for 12 months was evaluated on Composite of all-cause mortality or non-fatal centrally adjudicated new Q-wave myocardial infarction at 2 years (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.69-1.08, p=0.189). Ticagrelor monotherapy did not significantly reduce mortality or new Q-wave MI compared to standard therapy in ACS (RR 0.86; 95% CI 0.69-1.08) or SCAD (RR 0.87; 95% CI 0.71-1.08) patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: