An indirect fluorescence assay (IFA) with monoclonal antibodies developed for the detection of Cryptosporidium oocysts in fecal smears (Meridian Diagnostics, Inc., Cincinnati, Ohio) was compared with the Zeihl-Neelsen-modified acid-fast stain (MAFS) in 119 human fecal specimens collected between 1984 and 1987. The sensitivity of the IFA was 100%; all 56 specimens positive by MAFS exhibited fluorescence. There were 63 specimens negative for Cryptosporidium sp. by MAFS; of these, 61 were negative by IFA (97% specificity). This discrepancy may reflect an increased sensitivity of the IFA to detect oocysts that were not visualized by MAFS because of faint staining or a paucity of organisms. On average, the IFA required less time than the MAFS (1 versus 5 min, respectively) when only rare or few oocysts were present. Cost comparison of reagents showed the IFA to be three times more expensive. The IFA offers a reasonable alternative to the MAFS because of its high sensitivity and specificity, the simplicity of performing it and interpreting results, and its capability of providing a definitive diagnosis of Cryptosporidium oocysts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rusnak et al. (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: