The extraction efficiency of three soil metal extraction procedures (4 M HNO 3 extraction, HClO 4 digestion, and HF decomposition) were compared by determining Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb, and Zn contents of two sewage sludge‐treated soils. In soils not treated with sludges, approximately 50 and 75% of total metals (HF‐decomposed) were recovered by 4 M HNO 3 extraction and HClO 4 digestion, respectively. For sludge‐treated soils, between 70 and 80% of soil metals were recovered by 4 M HNO 3 extraction. The increase in extraction efficiency indicated that sludge‐borne heavy metals in soils were more extractable with 4 M HNO 3 than metals indigenous to soils. Amounts of Cd, Cr, Cu, and Zn recovered from sludge‐treated soils by HClO 4 were not significantly different from those recovered by HF decomposition. Recoveries of Ni and Pb by HClO 4 digestion, however, were less complete. It appeared that sludge‐borne Ni and Pb were either associated with silicate minerals or converted into silicate‐containing solid phase minerals after land application.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cao et al. (1984) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context:
More from Journal of Environmental Quality