An implicit assumption in most minimalist work is that DP as a whole carries all the φ-features with which external heads agree. In this paper I argue that under this assumption and the assumption that only a node that is φ-complete can delete the φ-features of a node with which it agrees, Chomsky's (2000, 2001) model of feature valuation is incompatible with a large body of work on the DP-internal distribution of φ-features, according to which neither N nor D enter the derivation being φ-complete. I consider several possible solutions and argue that this problem can most easily be avoided by adopting a feature-sharing model of the operation Agree, as proposed by Frampton & Gutmann (2006) and Pesetsky & Torrego (2007). Finally, several implications for Chomsky's theory of abstract Case are also discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gabi Danon (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: