Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
AIMS: The first aim of this study was to characterize the surface topography of a novel 3D-printed dental implant at the micro- and macro-level. Its second aim was to evaluate the osteogenic, angiogenic, and immunogenic responses of human oral osteoblasts (hOBs), gingival fibroblasts (hGFs), mesenchymal stem cells (hAD-MSCs), and monocytes to this novel implant surface. METHODS: A 3D-printed Ti-6Al-4 V implant was produced by selective laser melting and subjected to organic acid etching (TEST). It was then compared to a machined surface (CTRL). Its biological properties were evaluated via cell proliferation assays, morphological observations, gene expression analyses, mineralization assessments, and collagen quantifications. RESULTS: Scanning electron microscopy analysis showed that the TEST group was characterized by a highly interconnected porous architecture and a roughed surface. The morphological observations showed good adhesion of cells cultured on the TEST surface, with a significant increase in hOB growth. Similarly, the gene expression analysis showed significantly higher levels of osseointegration biomarkers. Picrosirius staining showed a slight increase in collagen production in the TEST group compared to the CTRL group. hAD-MSCs showed an increase in endothelial and osteogenic commitment-related markers. Monocytes showed increased mRNA synthesis related to the M2 (anti-inflammatory) macrophagic phenotype. CONCLUSIONS: Considering the higher interaction with hOBs, hGFs, hAD-MSCs, and monocytes, the prepared 3D-printed implant could be used for future clinical applications. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study demonstrated the excellent biological response of various cells to the porous surface of the novel 3D-printed implant.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Iezzi et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: