Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
January 19, 2005Conservation BiologyOpen Access

Genetic Differences between Wild and Artificial Populations of Metasequoia glyptostroboides : Implications for Species Recovery

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

YLYuanyuan LiXCXiaoyong ChenZXZhang Xin

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Li et al. (2005) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a831355b15ea8a8ea4ccf3dhttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00025.x
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1An Ecological Reconnaissance in the Native Home of Metasequoia Glyptostroboides1950 · 91 citations
  2. 2Population Genetic Consequences of Small Population Size: Implications for Plant Conservation1993 · 2,587 citations
  3. 3Patterns of Genetic Variation in in and ex situ Populations of the Threatened Chilean VineBerberidopsis corallina , Detected Using RAPD Markers2001 · 33 citations
  4. 4Genetic Variation and the Reproduction of Cordylanthus maritimus ssp. maritimus to Sweetwater Marsh, California1997 · 24 citations
  5. 5Ecological Genetics and the Restoration of Plant Communities: Mix or Match?1999 · 308 citations