Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BackgroundPneumococcal conjugated vaccine (PCV)7 and PCV13 programmes started in Israel from July 2009 and November 2010 respectively, with a 2+1 schedule (one dose at 2 months old, one at 4 months old, and a booster dose at 12 months old). Thereafter, invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) rates substantially declined in children. Uptake of all three doses in < 2-year-olds since 2012 is > 90%. For still incompletely vaccinated infants (≤ 12 months old), how well the PCV 2+1 programme shields from IPD is not fully resolved.AimTo assess the adequacy of protection conferred by the 2+1 schedule PCV vaccination programme, particularly among incompletely-vaccinated infants.MethodsThis was a population-based, prospective, nationwide active IPD surveillance study in Israel, 2004-2019, in children < 24 months old. We estimated annual incidence rates (IR) of overall IPD, IPD caused by PCV13 serotypes (VT13), and non-PCV13 serotypes (NVT13). Annual IPD IRs were stratified by age: < 4 months (receiving ≤ 1 dose), 4-6 months (immediately post dose 2), 7-12 months (a few months post dose 2), and 13-23 months (post dose 3). Late-PCV (2004-2008) to pre-PCV13 (2016-2019) mean annual IR ratios (IRRs) were calculated.Results2,569 IPD episodes were recorded. VT13 decreased > 90% in all age groups, while NVT13 seemed to increase. All-IPD rates declined in all age groups by 56-70%. The 2+1 schedule impact on 7-12-month-old infants (pre-booster) was similar to that on 13-23-month-old children (post booster), with PCV13 IPD reductions of 97% and 98%, respectively.ConclusionsIndirect (herd) protection of infants, including < 4 month-olds with ≤ 1 PCV dose, was achieved by the 2+1 PCV schedule programme which thus seems adequate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ben‐Shimol et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: