This study explores the effects of competitor pricing levels on relative revenue among over 4000 hotels in Europe over a 10-year period (2004-2013). This sample of European hotels, which included both independent and chain-affiliated properties, achieved higher revenue per available room (RevPAR) than direct competitors when they positioned their hotels with comparatively higher prices. These data revealed that regardless of the economic situation of the time period, hotels that positioned with average daily rates (ADRs) above those of their direct competitors benefited from higher relative RevPAR even though they experienced lower comparative occupancies. This finding was stronger for chain-affiliated vs. independent hotels. Maintaining a consistent relative price over time did not significantly affect revenue performance, controlling for hotel type and location. As is the case with previous, similar studies, the findings argue for a firm, strategic approach to pricing, rather than a reactive or strictly tactical approach.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Enz et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: