ABSTRACT 1. Measurements of digestible energy intake, live growth and carcass measurements were conducted with 96 individually housed pigs (48 male and 48 female) given the same diet at four feeding levels ( ad libitum ; Agricultural Research Council daily digestible energy intake (C); C–12·5%; and C–25% daily digestible energy intake. The pigs were slaughtered at one of six live weights (45, 60, 75, 90, 105, 120 kg). 2. Prediction equations of average daily live-weight gain and introscope P 2 backfat thickness on the hot carcass (hot P 2 ) were developed as functions of average daily digestible energy intake for males and females at varying live weights. The relationships found were 20·8 g live-weight gain per MJ digestible energy intake and 0·81 mm hot P 2 backfat thickness per MJ digestible energy intake from 25 to 90 kg live weight. 3. Compared with feeding level C, C –25% produced no difference in feed conversion ratio, reduced shoulder maximum, mid-back and loin minimum backfat thickness by 6–8 mm (14–4%), 4–2 mm (168%) and 4–1 mm (17–5%) respectively ( P <0·01) and increased eye-muscle area by 2908mm 2 (10·9%). 4. Compared with females, males reached slaughter weight 9·4 days earlier, increased daily live-weight gain by 64g, increased feed conversion ratio by 0·3, had 1·6mm less hot P 2 backfat thickness, had less backfat at all mid-line positions and showed no difference in eye-muscle area.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Giles et al. (1981) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: