Key result
Chronic peripheral administration of losartan and embusartan similarly inhibited blood pressure increases induced by central Ang II and sodium in Wistar rats.
Why the study?
Does peripheral administration of losartan or embusartan effectively exert central AT1 receptor blockade in Wistar rats?
Does peripheral administration of losartan or embusartan effectively exert central AT1 receptor blockade in Wistar rats?
Chronic peripheral administration of AT1 receptor blockers losartan and embusartan is similarly effective in achieving central AT1 receptor blockade in a rat model.
Peripheral ARB administration may achieve central AT1 blockade in rats; leaves open human translation and clinical relevance.
Central administration of AT1 receptor blockers prevents salt-sensitive hypertension and inhibits progression of CHF. We investigated in Wistar rats the effectiveness of peripheral administration of two AT1 receptor blockers, losartan and embusartan, in exerting central AT1 receptor blockade. Losartan or embusartan at doses of 30 and 100 mg/kg were administered subcutaneously (s.c.) as a single dose, or one dose daily for 6 days. The BP responses to intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) injection of Ang II, i.c.v. infusion of Na+-rich aCSF (0.3 M NaCl), and intravenous (i.v.) injection of Ang II were then measured. Losartan or embusartan at 30 and 100 mg/kg both inhibited the BP increases induced by i.c.v. Ang II and, to a lesser extent, by Na+-rich aCSF. After a single dose, this inhibition was more pronounced for losartan. However, after 6 days of treatment, there were no significant differences between the effects of losartan and embusartan. Losartan and embusartan blocked responses to Ang II i.v. to a similar extent. These results indicate that results from single-dose studies may not reflect the chronic steady-state, and that during chronic treatment both AT1 receptor blockers are similarly effective in inhibiting AT1 receptors in the central nervous system, when assessed by pressor responses to acute increases in CSF Na+ or CSF Ang II.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2001) studied this question. Losartan and embusartan was evaluated on Blood pressure responses to intracerebroventricular injection of Ang II, intracerebroventricular infusion of Na+-rich aCSF, and intravenous injection of Ang II. Chronic peripheral administration of losartan and embusartan similarly inhibited blood pressure increases induced by central Ang II and sodium in Wistar rats.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: