Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: The objective of the study was to investigate the influence of bimodal stimulation upon hearing ability for speech recognition in the presence of a single competing talker. METHOD: Speech recognition was measured in 3 listening conditions: hearing aid (HA) alone, cochlear implant (CI) alone, and both devices together (CI + HA). To examine the use of low-frequency cues, the competing masker voice was manipulated with respect to fundamental frequency (F0) and formant frequencies. Twelve implanted adults were included in the study. RESULTS: Group results revealed only a relatively small benefit of CI + HA compared with the CI alone. A detailed analysis of errors, which was assumed to be an indicator for the release from masking, revealed that this benefit was not attributed to improved target-masker segregation. The variable determined to be responsible for segregating target and masker talkers was a large difference in F0 of the voices. This held true for all CI alone, HA alone, and CI + HA listening conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Bimodal hearing improved overall speech recognition of both the target and the masker. No evidence for better target-masker separation with bimodal fitting could be found.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pyschny et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: