Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVES: To describe the characteristics and the problems arising from the use of vascular catheterization in a general hospital and to identify avoidable risk factors associated with catheter-related infections. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, including the entire hospitalized population. SETTING: A university-affiliated hospital. RESULTS: Three-hundred fifty-three intravascular catheters were implanted in 315 of a total of 1,838 hospitalized patients (17.1%, confidence interval [CI] = 15.7-18.5). Of the 353 intravascular catheters, 26 (7.3%) were intra-arterial, 273 (77.3%) were peripheral, and 54 (15.3%) were central. The median (range) duration of the catheterization was 3 (1-11) days for arterial catheters, 1 (1-24) for peripheral catheters, and 5 (1-130) for central catheters. Fifty-three (15%, CI = 11.5-19.5) showed signs of infection. Independent risk factors associated with infection were the presence of infection located elsewhere (odds ratio [OR] = 8.7, CI = 4.13-18.3, p less than .0001), inappropriate catheter care (OR = 5.3, CI = 2.5-11.2, p less than .0001), inappropriate length of catheter use (OR = 3.5, CI = 1.4-9.02, p less than .01), and duration of hospitalization exceeding 14 days (OR = 2.6, CI = 0.9-7.83, p = .07). CONCLUSION: The risk factors associated with catheter-related infections suggest that many are preventable by improved protocols for management. This hypothesis can easily be tested.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ena et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: