Why the study?
Surgeons will inevitably face severe intraoperative hemorrhage and potential intraoperative death, carrying significant emotional and professional costs that require preparation, situational awareness, and effective threat-and-error management.
Highlights the critical importance of situational awareness, leadership, and immediate surgical planning in managing severe intraoperative hemorrhage to prevent fatal outcomes.
Case reports of hemorrhage management support OR leadership awareness; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
All busy surgeons will eventually face a severe intraoperative hemorrhage and about one-third will have an intraoperative death. Situational awareness is the key to good operating room leadership and clinical performance. Technical, emotional, and professional skills are equally necessary. When hemorrhage occurs, some surgeons are affected by a “startle” response and freeze. An immediate surgical plan to stop the hemorrhage by pressure or direct vascular control is required. A stable patient presents other options such as waiting for additional surgical or interventional help; an unstable patient does not. The operating room team and family look to the surgeon as the threat-and-error manager. The surgeon must fill this role with a skilled, open, and compassionate approach rather than a hesitant, protective, or defensive approach. The urgent needs of the patient can require a surgeon to perform an unfamiliar or unpracticed exposure when there is no safe alternative. The emotional and professional cost of a fatal intraoperative hemorrhage is significant. With preparation, a better path for the surgeon, operating room staff and patient is possible. This review presents six actual scenarios of managing hemorrhage in orthopaedic surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
James W. Pritchett (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: