Why the study?
Aseptic meningitis epidemics can pose diverse healthcare challenges, prompting the need to examine clinical differences between enterovirus meningitis and other aseptic meningitis cases.
Does enterovirus-positive aseptic meningitis have a different clinical course and hospitalization duration compared to enterovirus-negative aseptic meningitis?
Does enterovirus-positive aseptic meningitis have a different clinical course and hospitalization duration compared to enterovirus-negative aseptic meningitis?
Enterovirus-positive meningitis predominantly affects younger patients and is associated with a shorter hospitalization time compared to enterovirus-negative aseptic meningitis.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Shorter hospitalization in EV-positive aseptic meningitis may inform discharge planning; leaves open generalizability and impact on outcomes in prospective cohorts.
BACKGROUND: Aseptic meningitis epidemics may pose various health care challenges. METHODS: We describe the German enterovirus meningitis epidemics in the university hospital centers of Düsseldorf, Cologne and Berlin between January 1st and December 31st, 2013 in order to scrutinize clinical differences from other aseptic meningitis cases.RESULTS: A total of 72 enterovirus (EV-positive) meningitis cases were detected in our multicenter cohort, corresponding to 5.8% of all EV-positive cases which were voluntarily reported within the National Enterovirus surveillance (EVSurv, based on investigation of patients with suspected aseptic meningitis/encephalitis and/or acute flaccid paralysis) by physicians within this period of time. Among these 72 patients, 38 (52.8%) were enterovirus positive and typed as echovirus (18 pediatric and 20 adult cases, median age 18.5 years; echovirus 18 (1), echovirus 2 (1), echovirus 30 (31), echovirus 33 (1), echovirus 9 (4)). At the same time, 45 aseptic meningitis cases in our cohort were excluded to be due to enteroviral infection (EV-negative). Three EV-negative patients were tested positive for varicella zoster virus (VZV) and one EV-negative patient for herpes simplex virus 2. Hospitalization was significantly longer in EV-negative cases. Cerebrospinal fluid analysis did not reveal significant differences between the two groups. After discharge, EV-meningitis resulted in significant burden of sick leave in our pediatric cohort as parents had to care for the children at home. CONCLUSIONS: Voluntary syndromic surveillance, such as provided by the EVSurv in our study may be a valuable tool for epidemiological research. Our analyses suggest that EV-positive meningitis predominantly affects younger patients and may be associated with a rather benign clinical course, compared to EV-negative cases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Graf et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: