A series of 15 field experiments was established to quantify the growth response of first‐thinning stands of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst) to whole‐tree harvesting and to estimate the need for nutrient compensation. The experiments were undertaken in Finland, Norway and Sweden and represent a wide range of site conditions. The site index (H 100) of Scots pine stands varied from 19 to 29 m, and that of Norway spruce stands from 28 to 36 m. Total amounts of biomass and nutrients removed were calculated based on data obtained from felled sample trees. During the first 5‐yr period the growth response to the removal of logging residues varied considerably in both pine and spruce stands. Regression analyses did not reveal any functions that explained the variation in results satisfactorily. In cases where whole‐tree harvesting influenced tree growth negatively, this effect was counteracted by compensatory fertilization. It was concluded that to determine the response of remaining trees to harvesting intensity reliably, the post‐harvest period analysed must be longer than 5 yrs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jacobson et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: