Users' perspective on rehabilitation interventions for young adult cancer survivors: A group concept mapping study

Figures

• 

  FIGURE 1. Flow chart illustrating the number of participants in the different phases and participation methods

• 

  FIGURE 2. The cluster rating map before the validation meeting in Phase V. The numbers correspond to the ideas within each cluster (Appendix A). The size and shape of the clusters are constructed by connecting the outer ideas in each cluster, and the size indicates how broad the meaning of the cluster's content is. More layers indicate a higher mean importance rating of that cluster (e.g., clusters with one layer have a mean importance rating between 3.65 and 3.73, and clusters with five layers have a mean importance rating between 3.96 and 4.04) (Kane & Rosas, 2018; Trochim & Kane, 2005; Trochim & McLinden, 2017).

• 

  FIGURE 3. Model of identified rehabilitation intervention components for young adult cancer survivors to strengthen their participation in everyday life. Legend: The cluster treatment and possibilities within the social and healthcare system encircles the young adult cancer survivor in the model's centre as the content primarily relates to structural and organisational conditions, which are a precondition for delivering and participating in rehabilitation. Peer‐to‐peer is presented as an oval as it is a distinct intervention component but also overlaps with other components containing elements of peer‐to‐peer support. The time arrow illustrates that the importance and relevance of the intervention components depend on the individual's cancer trajectory and life situation at a particular time point and that the period for the intervention components is not predefined.