Why the study?
Does beta-blocker therapy reduce non-sustained ventricular tachycardia and sudden cardiac death in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy?
Does beta-blocker therapy reduce non-sustained ventricular tachycardia and sudden cardiac death in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy?
Beta-blocker therapy effectively reduces the prevalence and new development of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy.
Beta-blockers were associated with reduced ventricular tachycardia in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
Beta-blocker therapy has been shown to improve cardiac function and prognosis in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). However, whether beta-blockers reduce severe ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death has not been clarified. The present study was designed to investigate the effects of beta-blockers on non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) and sudden cardiac death in patients with DCM. Sixty-five patients with DCM treated with diuretics, digitalis and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors were assigned to receive beta-blockers (n = 33) or not (n = 32). Mean follow-up was 53+/-30 months. The echocardiographic indices of cardiac function, the incidence of non-sustained VT on Holter monitoring electrocardiograms, and sudden cardiac death rate were compared between the 2 groups. Comparable improvement in cardiac function on echocardiograms was found in the 2 treatment groups. The patient group treated with beta-blockers showed a significant reduction in the prevalence of VT (from 43 to 15%, p<0.05) and the development of new episodes of VT (5 vs. 16%) compared to the group without beta-blockers. The sudden cardiac death rate did not differ between the 2 groups. The results of the present study suggest that beta-blockers are effective in reducing severe ventricular arrhythmias in patients with DCM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Inoue et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: