Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: A 2:1 (150 IU:75 IU) follitropin alfa:lutropin alfa formulation has been developed. A 3-year post-marketing surveillance study is ongoing in Germany to explore the use of this formulation in routine clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An 11-month interim analysis of data from assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles only is described. RESULTS: Data were available from 857 patients undergoing 919 cycles of ART at 19 centres. Most patients (58.7%) were aged ≥ 35 years, and many (41.3%) were undergoing their first ART cycle. Main reasons cited by physicians for prescribing this formulation were poor response in a previous treatment cycle (n = 303) and low basal luteinizing hormone (LH) level (n = 107). Mean (standard deviation) duration of ovarian stimulation was 10.8 (2.6) days. In 90.7% of cycles, the 2:1 formulation was administered throughout the stimulation period. Most frequent LH daily dose was 75 IU. Embryo transfer was conducted in 741 cycles; clinical pregnancy rate per transfer was 27.5%. Three cases of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome developed in three patients (3/741 [0.4%] cycles); one required hospitalization. No other major safety events were reported. CONCLUSION: This interim analysis shows that use of the 2:1 formulation for ovarian stimulation during routine ART procedures is effective in achieving clinical pregnancies and is associated with a positive safety profile.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bühler et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: