OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the value of a systematic approach to the diagnosis of pediatric interstitial lung disease (ILD). METHODS: In this descriptive, observational, prospective study, we evaluated 51 children presenting with ILD of unknown etiology during a 3-year period. Specific clinical information regarding history, physical examination, diagnostic evaluation, and final diagnosis was recorded on each patient. RESULTS: A specific diagnosis was established by history and physical examination alone in 1 patient, noninvasive tests alone in 8 others, and invasive tests, including lung biopsy, in another 26. Of the remaining patients, 8 had a suggestive diagnosis, and 8 had no specific diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: A systematic approach to the diagnosis of pediatric ILD is useful, and not all patients need lung biopsy for diagnosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fan et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: