Why the study?
Reported EVA71 vaccines and IgG antibodies lack cross-antiviral efficacy against other EV-A causing hand, foot and mouth disease, creating resistance to IgG-based immunotherapy.
Does the 20-IgM antibody improve cross-antiviral efficacy against enterovirus A compared to IgG-based immunotherapy in preclinical models?
Does the 20-IgM antibody improve cross-antiviral efficacy against enterovirus A compared to IgG-based immunotherapy in preclinical models?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The constructed 20-IgM antibody demonstrates broad and potent cross-antiviral efficacy against enterovirus A infections through a dual-blockage mechanism at pre- and post-attachment stages.
The reported enterovirus A 71 (EVA71) vaccines and immunoglobin G (IgG) antibodies have no cross-antiviral efficacy against other enterovirus A (EV-A) which caused hand, foot and mouth disease (HFMD). Here we constructed an IgM antibody (20-IgM) based on our previous discovery to address the resistance encountered by IgG-based immunotherapy. Although binding to the same conserved neutralizing epitope within the GH loop of EV-As VP1, the antiviral breath and potency of 20-IgM are still higher than its parental 20-IgG1. The 20-IgM blocks the interaction between the EV-As and its receptors, scavenger receptor class B, member 2 (SCARB2) and Kringle-containing transmembrane protein 1(KREMEN1) of the host cell. The 20-IgM also neutralizes the EV-As at the post-attachment stages, including postattachment neutralization, uncoating and RNA release inhibition after internalization. Mechanistically, the dual blockage effect of 20-IgM is dependent on both a conserved site targeting and high affinity binding. Meanwhile, 20-IgM provides cross-antiviral efficacy in EV-As orally infected neonatal ICR mice. Collectively, 20-IgM and its property exhibit excellent antiviral activity with a dual-blockage inhibitory effect at both the pre- and post-attachment stages. The finding enhances our understanding of IgM-mediated immunity and highlights the potential of IgM subtype antibodies against enterovirus infections.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhu et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: