We have synthesized [21-desasparagine,20-cysteine ethylamide-A]insulin and [21-desasparagine,20-cysteine 2,2,2-trifluoroethylamide-A]insulin, which differ from natural insulin in that the C-terminal amino residue of the A chain, asparagine, has been removed and the resulting free carboxyl group of the A20 cysteine residue has been converted to an ethylamide and a trifluoroethylamide group, respectively. [21-Desasparagine,20-cysteine ethylamide-A]insulin displayed equivalent potency in receptor binding and biological activity, ca. 12% and ca. 14%, respectively, relative to bovine insulin. In contrast, [21-desasparagine,20-cysteine 2,2,2-trifluoroethylamide-A]insulin displayed a divergence in these properties, ca. 13% in receptor binding and ca. 6% in biological activity. This disparity is ascribed to a difference in the electronic state of the A20-A21 amide bond in these two analogues. A model is proposed to account for the observation of divergence between receptor binding and biological activity in a number of synthetic insulin analogues and naturally occurring insulins. In this model, changes in the electronic state and/or the orientation of the A20-A21 amide bond can modulate biological activity independently of receptor binding affinity. The A20-A21 amide bond is thus considered as an important element in the "message region" of insulin.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chu et al. (1987) studied this question.