Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
December 1, 1986Journal of Clinical MicrobiologyOpen Access

Effect of blind passage and multiple sampling on recovery of Chlamydia trachomatis from urogenital specimens

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

RJRobert B. JonesEmory UniversityBKBarry P. KatzIndiana University School of MedicineBPBarbara Van Der PolUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Jones et al. (1986) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a83359f162ea9d73e990ecahttps://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.24.6.1029-1033.1986
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Three Sequential Methods of Collecting Material from the Urethra of Men for Culture for Chlamydia trachomatis1985 · 10 citations
  2. 2Sensitivity of immunofluorescence with monoclonal antibodies for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis inclusions in cell culture1982 · 109 citations
  3. 3Sampling, Specimen Handling, and Isolation Techniques in the Diagnosis of Chlamydial and Other Genital Infections1981 · 40 citations
  4. 4Persistent Infection of Mouse Fibroblasts (L Cells) with Chlamydia psittaci : Evidence for a Cryptic Chlamydial Form1980 · 71 citations
  5. 5Urethritis in women attending an STD clinic.1981 · 43 citations