Why the study?
Does intravenous nadolol have different effects on left ventricular performance compared to intravenous propranolol in subjects with ischemic wall-motion disorders?
Does intravenous nadolol have different effects on left ventricular performance compared to intravenous propranolol in subjects with ischemic wall-motion disorders?
Intravenous nadolol has similar acute effects on left ventricular performance as propranolol, suggesting its longer half-life may offer clinical advantages without additional myocardial depression.
Similar acute LV effects may favor nadolol's longer action; leaves open outcome benefits in ischemic wall-motion disorders.
Nadolol, a recently developed noncardioselective beta-adrenergic blocker, has the potential advantages of a longer oral half-life (t 1/2) than propranolol and, in animal studies, markedly fewer direct myocardial depressant effects. Neither the relative intravenous potency of nadolol and propranolol nor the comparative effects of the 2 drugs on left ventricular performance has been studied in man. We compared equiblocking intravenous doses of nadolol and propranolol in 10 subjects with ischemic wall-motion disorders. Nadolol was on the average 6.2 times as potent on a milligram-for-milligram basis. Both drugs decreased resting heart rate (p less than 0.02) and produced small rises in both mean pulmonary artery (p less than 0.03) and mean pulmonary artery wedge (p less than 0.03) pressures without significantly reducing the cardiac output. Both drugs also produced depression of the radionuclide ejection fraction (p less than 0.002). There were no significant differences between the effects of the 2 drugs on any of the aforementioned variables. Thus, the effects of nadolol on left ventricular performances are similar to those of propranolol. Because of its long oral t 1/2, nadolol may prove to be a clinically useful drug.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Winter et al. (1979) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: