Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
It has been suggested that patients with refractory eosinophilic airway inflammation represent a separate "eosinophilic" asthma phenotype associated with increased morbidity and a poor prognosis. To investigate whether persistent eosinophilia in these patients is a fixed feature or can still be modified by treatment, we investigated the effect of high-dose intramuscular corticosteroids on eosinophils in induced sputum. Twenty-two patients with stable severe asthma (15 women, aged 21-73 years) participated in this double-blind, placebo-controlled study. All were using inhaled corticosteroids (> or = 1,600 microg/day) or chronic oral prednisone. They were included if the percentage of eosinophils in induced sputum was above the upper limit of normal (> or = 2%). Two weeks after treatment with triamcinolone, but not placebo, sputum eosinophils almost completely disappeared from a median of 12.6-0.2% (p < 0.001). In 82% of patients, no eosinophils could be observed at all. In addition, the rescue medication score decreased from 1.4 to 0.8 (p = 0.01), and FEV1 improved from a median of 73.8-88.3% predicted (p = 0.001). We conclude that persistent sputum eosinophilia despite extensive antiasthma treatment is not a refractory phenomenon but is still sensitive to high-dose systemic corticosteroids. This implies that these patients with severe asthma need additional or alternative antiinflammatory treatment to combat the eosinophilia and associated poor prognosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brinke et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: