Why the study?
Does aortic valvotomy provide long-term relief of symptoms and improve hemodynamics in patients with congenital valvular aortic stenosis?
Does aortic valvotomy provide long-term relief of symptoms and improve hemodynamics in patients with congenital valvular aortic stenosis?
Aortic valvotomy provides effective long-term symptom relief and hemodynamic improvement in children and young adults with congenital aortic stenosis, with minimal operative risk.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Offers historical benchmark for valvotomy in congenital AS; leaves open prospective comparison with modern valve strategies.
Thirty-eight patients with congenital valvular aortic stenosis, ages 1 to 21 years, underwent aortic valvotomy between 1957 and 1967. The conditions of 37 patients have been evaluated postoperatively, and the mean duration of follow-up is ten years. There were no operative deaths, but there was one late death attributable to heart disease. Relief of symptoms has been gratifying, and 90% of the patients are asymptomatic currently. Twenty patients have murmurs of aortic regurgitation, and three of these patients have required aortic valve replacement. Postoperative hemodynamic assessments have shown that valvotomy reduced the valvular gradient in each patient. Thus, long-term relief of congenital valvular aortic stenosis may be effected by valvotomy with minimal operative and postoperative risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
David M. Conkle (1973) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: