Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The in-vivo biological activity of recombinant methionyl insulin-like growth factor I (met-IGF-I) was demonstrated in hypophysectomized rats by following blood glucose after an i.v. bolus injection of met-IGF-I; a dose-dependent decrease in blood sugar was seen. Membrane transport was studied using the non-metabolizable amino acid alpha-aminoisobutyric acid; stimulation was obtained with the highest dose used (90 micrograms/rat). To test the original somatomedin hypothesis, growth studies were performed in hypophysectomized rats. Two or three doses of met-IGF-I were given with three different administration regimes (i.v. or s.c. infusion, or s.c. injections twice daily) for 6 or 8 days. Little growth-promoting activity was observed, with a significant effect on body weight gain obtained only when met-IGF-I was given continuously at the highest dose used (180 micrograms/day). No effect was seen on the in-vivo uptake of radioactive sulphate into cartilage. Epiphyseal cartilage width increased slightly at the highest dose of met-IGF-I, but only when the hormone was given by infusion. When 180 micrograms met-IGF-I/day were given by injections, a significant effect on longitudinal bone growth was obtained (90 micron above control). The levels of IGF in the serum were not measurably increased after s.c. administration of met-IGF-I, whereas after i.v. infusion, significantly raised levels were obtained at the higher dose rates (3.0 +/- 0.3 and 2.8 +/- 0.1 units/ml). Growth hormone was much more effective than met-IGF-I even at 50-fold lower doses. Priming the animals with 10 mu. bovine GH/day followed by combined infusions of GH and met-IGF-I did not reveal any potentiating effects of met-IGF-I in the presence of GH. We conclude that met-IGF-I is a relatively poor growth-promoting agent when given systemically, and that somatomedins are more likely to act as local growth factors rather than as circulating mediators of the growth-promoting effects of GH.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Skottner et al. (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: