Establishment of Preanalytical Quality Indicators and Current Status of Preanalytical Phase Laboratory Performance Monitoring in the Clinical Laboratories in Korea

This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.

Background:The preanalytical phase is more vulnerable to errors.This study aimed to establish preanalytical quality indicators (QIs) suitable for Korean clinical laboratories and investigate the current status of preanalytical phase performance monitoring in Korea using these QIs.Methods: We reviewed previous studies investigating preanalytical QIs including the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry (IFCC) model of QIs, to establish a set of QIs for Korean clinical laboratories.An e-mail survey consisting of this QI set was sent to 90 clinical laboratories.The collected data were analyzed, and performance measures were evaluated according to the quality specifications defined by the IFCC and the sigmascale method.Results: A model consisting of 23 preanalytical phase QIs was established.Approximately 47% (42/90) of clinical laboratories responded to the survey.The average result submission rate for each QI was 56% (standard deviation, 26%).The QIs with the highest and lowest result submission rates were "rejected samples due to hemolysis" (95%) and "recollected sample due to errors caused outside the laboratory" (17%).The QIs with the highest and lowest error rates were "hemolyzed sample detected by hemolytic index" (median, 0.546%; sigma performance level, "good") and "samples not received" (median, 0.001%; sigma performance level, "very good"), respectively.Conclusions: This survey findings on preanalytical phase QIs could serve as a foundation for developing an external quality assessment program for clinical laboratories in Korea.