Why the study?
Does surgical repair of postinfarction ventricular septal defect provide comparable long-term survival in patients ≥70 years compared to those <70 years?
Does surgical repair of postinfarction ventricular septal defect provide comparable long-term survival in patients ≥70 years compared to those <70 years?
Surgical repair of postinfarction ventricular septal defects in patients over 70 years of age results in excellent long-term survival and functional status, comparable to younger patients.
Supports repair consideration in selected patients ≥70 years; leaves open need for randomized confirmation in postinfarction VSD.
Ventricular septal defect (VSD) is an infrequent but extremely serious complication of myocardial infarction. Operative mortality rates tend to be higher in the elderly population; however, long-term follow-up has not been specifically studied. It is, therefore, important to assess not only the early but also the long-term results of VSD repair in patients over 70 years of age to determine its value for the elderly patient. Between June 1968 and May 1991, 86 patients who experienced a myocardial infarction underwent surgical repair of an infarct related VSD at the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH). Group I (n = 57) includes those patients younger than 70 years, and group II (n = 29) represents those patients age 70 years and older. Follow-up of hospital survivors ranged from 1 month to 24 years and was compiled in April and May, 1991. Three patients were lost to follow-up (4%), and these were younger than 70 years of age. There were no differences in the values of the preoperative variables for the younger and older groups with respect to sex, concomitant procedures performed (bypass vs no bypass), use of an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), location of VSD, presence of shock, total hospital days, or days between infarction and operation. There was, however, a difference between the two groups relative to the era when surgery was performed. More patients over the age of 70 underwent surgery after 1978 than before 1978 (p = 0.0012). The majority of survivors are in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class I or II, and there was no difference between the younger and older groups in functional class at the time of follow-up (83.3% vs 91.7% of survivors in Class I or II, respectively). Using the generalized Wilcoxon test to analyze these survival data, there was no apparent difference in long-term survival (p = 0.97) when comparing the two age groups. The mean follow-up period was 77.02 months for the younger group and 80.52 months for the older group. The fact that more older patients were repaired after we had significant experience in the surgical management of patients with VSDs probably accounted for our excellent results in the older age group. Our data reveal that patients over the age of 70 can expect excellent long-term survival, with over 90% of these survivors remaining in NYHA Functional Class I or II.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Muehrcke et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: