Why the study?
Does MultiPoint pacing improve haemodynamic and clinical benefits compared to conventional biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure undergoing cardiac resynchronisation therapy?
Does MultiPoint pacing improve haemodynamic and clinical benefits compared to conventional biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure undergoing cardiac resynchronisation therapy?
MultiPoint pacing using a quadripolar lead may offer sustained haemodynamic and clinical benefits over conventional biventricular pacing in heart failure patients undergoing cardiac resynchronisation therapy.
Does not yet support routine MultiPoint pacing in CRT; leaves open need for randomized confirmation of sustained benefits.
Cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) using biventricular pacing is an established therapy for impairment of left ventricular (LV) systolic function in patients with heart failure (HF). Although technological advances have improved outcomes in patients undergoing biventricular pacing, the optimal placement of pacing leads remains challenging, and approximately one third of patients have no response to CRT. This may be due to patient selection and lead placement. Electrical mapping can greatly improve outcomes in CRT and increase the number of patients who derive benefit from the procedure. MultiPoint™ pacing (St Jude Medical, St Paul, MN, US) using a quadripolar lead increases the possibility of finding the best pacing site. In clinical studies, use of MultiPoint pacing in HF patients undergoing CRT has been associated with haemodynamic and clinical benefits compared with conventional biventricular pacing, and these benefits have been sustained at 12 months. This article describes the proceedings of a satellite symposium held at the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) Europace conference held in Milan, Italy, in June 2015.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2015 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: