Why the study?
Current CAD guidelines recommend ruling-in or ruling-out patients using pretest probability, prompting the development and validation of an ECG-based deep-learning algorithm without ischemia evidence.
Does a deep-learning algorithm based on ECG accurately rule-in or rule-out CAD in suspected patients?
Does a deep-learning algorithm based on ECG accurately rule-in or rule-out CAD in suspected patients?
A deep-learning algorithm based on standard 12-lead ECGs without ischemic changes can effectively rule-in or rule-out CAD, achieving guideline-recommended performance thresholds.
May aid CAD triage via routine ECG in suspected patients; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
Background: Current coronary artery disease (CAD) guidelines recommend to rule-out or rule-in patients for further examination by assessing a pretest probability (PTP) ≤ 5 % or ≥ 15 %. We developed and validated a deep-learning algorithm for rule-in or rule-out based on electrocardiogram (ECG) without myocardial ischemia evidence. Methods: Between October 2019 and June 2022, data from two centers (Fuwai Hospital [Beijing] and Yunnan Fuwai Hospital) of CAD-suspected patients undergoing either coronary angiography or coronary computed tomography were used. Data from the Fuwai Hospital (Beijing) were used to train (randomly 90 %) and internally validate (randomly 10 %) a deep-learning algorithm to detect CAD (≥ 70 % stenosis) based on 12-lead ECGs. An algorithm-based decision-making protocol was established for rule-out or rule-in based on a predefined threshold allowing for a 95 % negative predictive value (NPV). Data from the Yunnan Fuwai Hospital were used to externally validate the performance of the decision-making protocol. The CAD prevalence was calculated in patients who were recommended to rule-in or rule-out. Results: In internal validation set, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.81 and the CAD prevalence of patients who were recommended rule-out and rule-in were 5 % (40/790) and 23 % (527/2253), respectively. In external validation set, the CAD prevalence of patients who were recommended rule-out and rule-in were 0 % (0/661) and 15 % (255/1699), respectively. Conclusions: Our algorithm based on ECG without myocardial ischemia evidence performed good in CAD detection. An algorithm-based decision-making protocol could achieve the guideline-recommended performance in guiding rule-out or rule-in for further examination.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: