Interpretation of changes in midpoint potential of the "special pair" in bacterial photosynthetic reaction centers caused by site-directed mutagenesis is discussed in terms of a simple tight-binding model which relates them to concomitant variations in spin distribution between the two bacteriochlorophyll molecules of the special pair. Our analysis improves on previous similar ones by Allen and co-workers [Artz, K., Williams, J. C., Allen, J. P., Lendzian, F., Rautter, J., and Lubitz, W. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 94, 13582; Ivancich, A., Artz, K., Williams, J. C., Allen, J. P., and Mattioli, T. A. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 11812] in that it is both more complete, including electron-phonon coupling, and more accurate. It is applied to analyze data for a series of M160 mutants of Rhodobacter sphaeroides, yielding a value of 0.18+/-0.03 eV for the electronic coupling energy between the highest occupied levels of the two bacteriochlorophylls in the wild-type and a value of the energy offset E(o) between the highest occupied molecular orbitals of the L and M bacteriochlorophylls of 0.14+/-0.03 eV. For a mutant in which the electron hole in the special pair cation is located entirely on the reactive (L) side, a potential of 641+/-30 mV with respect to the normal hydrogen electrode is predicted. This agrees well with the average value ca. 650 mV observed for the heterodimer mutant HL(M202) in which the bacteriochlorophyll on the unreactive M side has been replaced by a bacteriopheophytin, causing extensive charge localization. However, the deduced coupling is found to be very sensitive to small changes in the assumptions used in the model, and various important chemical effects remain to be included.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reimers et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: