Why the study?
It remained unclear whether noncontact video-based pulse rate detection is feasible when videos are recorded in unstable lighting conditions.
The ASTHF algorithm demonstrates improved robustness for noncontact pulse rate detection from facial videos under unstable lighting conditions.
May improve noncontact pulse monitoring in unstable lighting; leaves open clinical validation before adoption.
Recent studies have shown that changes in human facial skin color due to varying blood flows can be recorded on videos by consumer-level cameras and, interestingly, can be used to measure pulse rates in a noncontact manner. However, it remains unclear whether the video-based pulse rate detection is feasible when videos are recorded in unstable lighting conditions. To address unstable illumination, a novel algorithm named adaptive spatiotemporal homomorphic filtering (ASTHF) is proposed in this article, with a focus on the separation of pulse signals and illumination-induced noise. This method first employs the homomorphic filtering framework to make illumination-induced noise in a video linearly separable. Subsequently, it incorporates a spatiotemporal filter into the framework, aiming to remove illumination-induced noise from both the time domain and the space domain of the video. To adapt to diverse illumination in the real world, the filter parameters are determined adaptively according to the sparsity in frequency spectrum of pulse signals. ASTHF is tested on two data sets, including 406 video samples. The test results show that ASTHF has stronger robustness to unstable illumination than state-of-the-art methods, improving the Pearson’s correlation coefficient by 5% in a challenging scenario compared with the best contrasting method. The proposed method demonstrates promise to achieve noncontact pulse rate detection from facial videos involving unsteady illumination.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: