A new boundary condition has been developed for the discrete element method. This boundary is different from the conventional periodic, rigid, or flexible boundries. This new boundary mechanism was developed to simulate triaxial tests. The new boundary, hydrostatic boundary, simulated the chamber fluid but not the rubber membrane. When a particle (ellipsoids in our simulations) contacts the hydrostatic boundary, pressure is developed. The interaction between the particle and the boundary is calculated analytically based on geometry. This hydrostatic boundary condition was implemented into an existing ellipsoidal discrete element code. Triaxial compression drained tests were performed with both periodic and hydrostatic boundaries. The result showed an increase in friction angle over the values observed from the periodic boundary mechanism. The result also closely resembles the experimental triaxial data. Thirteen specimens were generated and were used to investigate the following variables: particle shape, specimen size, and void ratio. A unique slope of the linear relationship between friction angle and void ratio was identified for monosize specimens of different particle shapes. It is found that the friction angle decreases as the aspect ratio increases provided that the void ratio of the two specimens is the same. The friction angle is linear proportional to the coordination number for monosize specimens regardless the specimen size. Also, the specimen size does not influence the behavior of two-size specimens.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tang‐Tat Ng (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: