Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We examined the cerebral circulatory effects of intra-carotid infusion of histamine or its receptor agonists in anesthetized rats. Cerebral blood flow was measured by two methods: an intracarotid 133 Xe clearance technique and tissue sampling after systemic administration of the diffusible tracer, [ 14 C]iodoantipyrine. Brain metabolic responses were estimated by the 2-deoxyglucose method and tissue sampling. Intracarotid infusion of histamine when the blood-brain barrier was intact did not increase cerebral blood flow. Following disruption of the blood-brain barrier by carotid injection of hypertonic urea, histamine evoked dose-dependent increases ( 133 Xe clearance method) in cerebral blood flow to a maximum of 50% (20 μg min −1 kg −1 ); histamine produced increases in blood flow to areas supplied by the internal carotid artery, e.g., thalamus and parietal cortex ([ 14 C]iodoantipyrine method). Both classes of histamine receptors (H 1 and H 2 ) participated in mediating increases in cerebral blood flow after blood-brain barrier opening. Mepyramine (H 1 -antagonist) and metiamide (H 2 -antagonist) attenuated blood flow responses to histamine infusion ( 133 Xe clearance method); metiamide was the more effective blocking agent. Pyridylethylamine (H 1 -agonist) and dimaprit (H 2 -agonist) both caused increases in regional cerebral blood flow ([ 14 C]iodoantipyrine method). Histamine infusion after blood-brain barrier opening did not increase cerebral glucose consumption. We suggest that increases in cerebral blood flow produced by histamine are the result of stimulation of vascular H 1 - and H 2 -receptors, rather than a secondary response to metabolic activation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gross et al. (1981) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: