Atherosis and incomplete trophoblastic invasion are interrelated pathophysiological processes that contribute to placental hypoperfusion and subsequent pregnancy complications like preeclampsia.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports mechanistic studies of bidirectional placental pathology; does not yet inform preeclampsia management.
There are two distinct histological manifestations of impaired placental implantation in humans-incomplete trophoblastic vascular invasion and atherosis. Both have been described to occur in pregnancies affected by a variety of disorders such as preeclampsia, fetal growth restriction, systemic lupus erythematosus, and diabetes. Our purpose was to integrate recent developments in the understanding of implantation site disorders into a pathophysiological scenario that interrelates these placentation disorders and associated pregnancy complications. Sources were identified from a MEDLINE search of English-language articles published from 1966 to 1997. Additional sources were identified from references cited in relevant reports. We selected articles relating to the following topics: atherosis, implantation site disorders, trophoblastic invasion, preeclampsia, fetal growth restriction, implantation site development, atherosclerosis, and endothelial activation-damage. A contemporary version of normal placentation, including vascular adaptation, was reviewed with comments on normal trophoblastic differentiation and vascular invasion. Specific abnormalities of the implantation site, including atherosis and incomplete trophoblastic invasion, were discussed in the context of placental site hypoperfusion and the association with pregnancy complications. It was concluded that atherosis and incomplete trophoblastic invasion may be both a consequence and a cause of placental site hypoperfusion resulting in the development of preeclampsia and a variety of other pregnancy disorders. Target Audience Obstetricians & Gynecologists, Family Physicians Learning Objectives After completion of this article, the reader will be able to understand the physiology of a normal implantation and the pathophysiology of the two distinct types of impaired implantations in humans and also to understand the various conditions associated with the impaired implantations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rogers et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: