Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: To develop a model-based method for automatic evaluation of radio frequency (RF) ablation treatment using magnetic resonance (MR) images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: RF current lesions were generated in a rabbit thigh model using MR imaging (MRI) guidance. We created a 12-parameter, three-dimensional, globally deformable model with quadric surfaces that delineates lesion boundaries and is automatically fitted to MR grayscale data. We applied this method to in vivo T2- and contrast-enhanced (CE) T1-weighted MR images acquired immediately post-ablation and four days later. We then compared results to manually segmented MR and three-dimensional registered corresponding histological boundaries of cellular damage. RESULTS: Resulting lesions featured a two-boundary appearance with an inner region and an outer hyperintense margin on MR images. For automated vs. manual MR boundaries, the mean errors over all specimens were 0.19 +/- 0.51 mm and 0.27 +/- 0.52 mm for the inner surface, and -0.29 +/- 0.40 mm and -0.12 +/- 0.17 mm for the outer surface, for T2- and CE T1-weighted images, respectively. For automated vs. histological boundaries, mean errors over all specimens were 0.07 +/- 0.64 mm and 0.33 +/- 0.71 mm for the inner surface, and -0.27 +/- 0.69 mm and 0.02 +/- 0.43 mm for the outer surface, for T2- and CE T1-weighted images, respectively. All boundary errors compared favorably to MR voxel dimensions, which were 0.7 mm in-plane and 3.0 mm thick. CONCLUSION: The method is accurate both in describing MR-apparent boundaries and in predicting histological response and has applications in lesion visualization, volume estimation, and treatment evaluation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lazebnik et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: