Objectives: To evaluate the usefulness of ¹¹C-choline positron emission tomography (PET) for primary staging and re-staging of prostate cancer. Patients and Methods:¹¹C-choline PET, a total of 22 scans, was performed on 13 patients with histologically proven prostate cancer in primary staging (n = 6) and recurrent site staging; following radical prostatectomy (n = 5) and following radiation therapy (n = 3). In 1 patient, ¹¹C-choline PET was performed in both primary staging and re-staging. Also, 3 patients histologically proven to have no malignant prostate were included. Results: Because urinary ¹¹C-choline activity was low, it did not interfere with the visualization of pelvic structures. ¹¹C-choline PET visualized normal prostate with a mean SUV of 2.99 (range 2.27–3.68) and primary prostate cancer as a hot spot in 5/6 scans with a mean SUV of 4.21 (range 2.99–6.2). In re-staging,¹¹C-choline PET was true positive in 9/16 scans and true negative in 2/16 scans. 5/16 scans in 2 patients were false negative with negative conventional imaging. Conclusions: In primary staging, ¹¹C-choline PET may not be of use because of no reliable differential ¹¹C-choline uptake of BPH and prostate cancer. On the other hand, ¹¹C-choline PET may be of value in recurrent site staging and monitoring for the prostate cancer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yoshida et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: