Why the study?
Observational studies have shown a correlation between unpleasant emotions and coronary atherosclerosis, but the underlying causal linkages remain uncertain.
Do genetically predicted unpleasant emotions increase the risk of coronary atherosclerosis?
Do genetically predicted unpleasant emotions increase the risk of coronary atherosclerosis?
Genetically predicted unpleasant emotions are causally associated with a significantly increased risk of coronary atherosclerosis, highlighting the importance of psychosocial stress as a cardiovascular risk factor.
Supports psychosocial stress assessment in CV risk; leaves open whether targeting unpleasant emotions prevents atherosclerosis.
Objective Observational studies have shown a correlation between unpleasant emotions and coronary atherosclerosis, but the underlying causal linkages are still uncertain. We conducted a Mendelian randomization (MR) investigation on two samples for this purpose. Methods In genome-wide association studies in the UK Biobank (total = 459,561), we selected 40 distinct single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) related to unpleasant emotions as genome-wide statistically significant instrumental variables. FinnGen consortium provided summary-level data on coronary atherosclerosis for 211,203 individuals of Finnish descent. MR-Egger regression, the inverse variance weighted technique (IVW), and the weighted median method were used in the process of conducting data analysis. Results There was sufficient evidence to establish a causal connection between unpleasant emotions and coronary atherosclerosis risk. For each unit increase in the log-odds ratio of unpleasant feelings, the odds ratios were 3.61 (95% CI: 1.64–7.95; P = 0.001). The outcomes of sensitivity analyses were comparable. There was no indication of heterogeneity or directional pleiotropy. Conclusion Our findings provide causal evidence for the effects of unpleasant emotions on coronary atherosclerosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lei et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: