Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Estimating the as-placed properties of mine backfill is fundamental to optimizing the safety and productivity of underground mines. For cemented paste backfill (CPB), an important consideration is the extent to which self-weight consolidation during deposition may reduce the void ratio and enhance the binder’s effectiveness. Field monitoring and sampling campaigns can help investigate this phenomenon but they are expensive and logistically difficult. Therefore, mesoscale column experiments are performed in the controlled laboratory environment to better understand the coupling between self-weight consolidation and cement hydration. In this paper, columns are backfilled with uncemented paste tailings and with CPB and the pore water pressure, electrical conductivity, and volume changes are monitored during and after backfilling. The pore water pressure profiles at the end of backfilling are compared with an available analytical solution and restrictions on the solution’s validity are identified. Void ratios of samples taken from columns are compared with the ones obtained from field samples and the similarity indicates the filling conditions simulated in the laboratory are representative of field conditions. The changes in void ratio after curing were small compared to the initial void ratio of fresh CPB. The tests’ results help explain why self-weight consolidation during backfilling is not significant at the studied mine, which may be the case for many other mining operations as well.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shahsavari et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: